Archives for category: Writing

When I lived in that commune in Marin back in the 70s, we had a deck where we did aerobics. My clearest musical memory of that deck is of running in place and listening to the soundtrack to Tommy which we had on a reel-to-reel tape, for some reason. I don’t recall that we had any other tapes to play on that machine. (I also recall that that tape broke and someone spliced it.) My clearest song memories are of Elton John’s Pinball Wizard and Tina Turner’s Acid Queen. Oddly not Clapton’s recording of Eyesight to the Blind (the album’s only cover, though other Mose Allison songs were in the running, according to the Pinball Wizard episode (part 1 of 2, here, though the investigation of Tommy itself is in part 2) of A History of Rock Music in 500 Songs – the impetus for this blog entry) or several other memorable tracks. I’m sure Cousin Kevin and Uncle Ernie affected me given my own experience of abuse at Synanon and were worthwhile things to excise from my brain until later.

The key thing is that here was one of my formative experiences of rock and roll. We listened to a lot of music in the commune, but my other memories are of the MOR stylings of San Francisco’s KFRC, the only good station we could get in that far north. Silly Love Songs, Boz Scaggs’ Lowdown and Lido Shuffle, Love Will Keep Us Together, Knowing Me Knowing You, Don’t Go Breaking My Heart were all in heavy rotation in the year before I left in the Fall of ‘77. None of these had the sheer force of The Who’s music, even in the weird forms it took on the film soundtrack. I’d have the LP later on, and the original Who album as well. The original rock opera never grabbed me in the same way, though Daltrey’s rendition of Acid Queen certainly made its own impression.

I’m sure I’ve seen the movie all the way through at least once, maybe twice. All Ken Russell movies are strange, but the 70s stuff is out of this world. (Noting that his Altered States [1980] is one of my all time faves.) That said, watching a few clips on YouTube is enough to assure me I don’t really need to watch it again. In addition there are a dozen or so recordings of The Who performing Tommy in its entirety – this started no longer after their LP was released and continued through most of their subsequent tours, it seems. In general, I’m more interested in how they handle their other songs live than these. There was also a stage musical that I’ve never checked out either. That said, I’m now downloading the soundtrack and the original album.

Weirdly, my current book club reading is Michael Chabon’s The Yiddish Policemen’s Union which has an interesting plot point about a possible messiah that speaks in an odd way to Tommy’s own messianic aspect.

Okay, one of my regular podcasts is We Will Rank You (youtube link) in which several friends from southern California rank the songs on albums from bottom to top. Some episodes they go through the whole album, sometimes they discuss their top 5 songs. One of the reasons I enjoy it is that the hosts are only a few years younger than I am and often my tastes and theirs align.

In the most recent episode (The Pixies’ Doolittle), one of the guys asked: Are there any unrankable albums – albums in which there are no duff songs. Great question. Before they moved on, Radiohead’s OK Computer was offered. Yeah, possibly. In my Radiohead canon, The Bends and In Rainbows are better, but that’s a discussion for another day. What’s the first album that comes to mind for you, dear reader? My brain goes to David Bowie first, as always. Are there albums of his that are so perfect that no song ranks lower than any other? The run from StationToStation (1976) through Scary Monsters (And Super Creeps) (1980) fulfills this for me, but what about 1975’s Young Americans (7 days out of 10, my favourite DB album)?

Clocking in at 8 tracks and 41 minutes, it is almost unrankable. The title track comes in first. From Andy Newmark’s drum riff and Mike Garson’s piano trill, it’s a perfect song. From Win (track 2) through to Fame (track 8, a John Lennon cowrite and Bowie’s first #1 US hit) there are no missteps. Except for a very strange cover of the Beatles’ Across the Universe. It’s possible that even in the Beatles’ canon that song is a misstep. Fight me.

The folks on We Will Rank You talk about ‘the line’ by which they mean, how many of these songs are absolutely necessary. Obviously for me with this album, the line is 7. When Bowie came to make his next album, 1976’s Station To Station, he only included six songs. And for that album , my line is also 6. (Weirdly, the title track, which clocks in at just over 10 minutes, is actually three songs stitched together, but the whole thing works perfectly as one track.)

It used to be that my daily listening included audio drama, music discussion, book discussions/audiobooks and a lot of politics. These days I’ve dropped to politics for the most part and have happily found more music discussions.

Discord & Rhyme has been running for seven years (164 episodes as of this writing) and is one of several music panel shows I listen to regularly. The format is usually three or four out of a group of seven regular panelists (plus occasional guests) discuss an album that one of them has chosen for the episode. The person who chose it tells the history of the artist up to that point and why they picked the album. They then talk individually about their histories with the album/artist (if any) and then dive in, talking about the album song by song. Finally, they suggest to listeners where to go next if they liked the album in question.

All of the panelists have a great love for a fairly wide variety of music, though most of the albums they’ve covered are in the pop realm to some degree (with a fair helping of prog – including seven (and counting) Moody Blues episodes). Once they get down to the tracks it’s primarily a matter of ‘I love/don’t love this track, and here’s why.’ And they really dive in – recent episodes run well over an hour. They took two for Nine Inch Nails’ The Downward Spiral and over three (divided into two episodes) for Prince’s Sign O’ The Times. The thing that makes this podcast even more interesting for me is the various digressions into the sources of songs, who played what on each track, where a track has been sampled, and so forth.

The discussion of Prince’s The Cross is a good example of the variety of opinion they bring to bear. One panelist commented that he didn’t like the song because there’s no musical development in it – it’s the same short piece of music over and over. Another (John McFerrin, I think) went into how it appeals to him because it accumulates, like Ravel’s Bolero. It starts with something very quiet and then the instruments just pile on one by one until there’s this grand explosion of sound. And I always joke that as a Jew, it’s weird that The Cross is my favourite song on that album. While I’d never thought about it that way, I’m quite fond of that kind of music as well, no matter the genre.

I’ve mostly listened to episodes on albums I know but I look forward to going back into albums I don’t. They clip generously so even a newcomer to an album can get what they’re talking about.

Another interesting thing that comes up in their discussions is what makes a perfect album opener, what makes for a great track two. The idea of a good album having a statement of purpose that sets up what’s to come. For many pop albums this is an ideal rather than something put into practice, but given the entire crew’s love for progressive rock (probably the genre that set the stage for this kind of musical analysis), this comes into their discussions pretty regularly. In considering my own efforts (some on this very blog) into album reviewing, this isn’t something that has come to my mind before. At least not in so many words.

logo of the podcast Discord & Rhyme features a section of a CD to the left of the podccast's name and a section of an LP to the right

I have a variety of responses to their analyses based on how well I know or love an album or an individual track, but that’s not surprising. The hosts are all about my same age (mid 50s) and part of what I enjoy is the common experiences we have with the albums that came out in the 80s and 90s. There’s something comforting in that. Or amusing when one of them might say, ‘My first experience with this album was when that week’s host chose it for this podcast.’ The fresh ears they sometimes bring helps to open my ears to things I may have forgotten.

I divide my podcast listening between audio drama and music discussions. Currently, we’re into the third and final season of The Strange Case of Starship Iris, one of the best of the SF audio dramas going.

It’s a combination of great storytelling and characterization – these, of course, being the keys to much great audio drama. We can’t see the characters, so we’re dependent on how they talk to one another, right? How well do they do it. There are even two characters in this drama with the same name, and we don’t confuse them. Technically good work, but the storytelling is key.

So what’s it about. In the first episode, Violet Liu is the only survivor of a sabotaged spaceship (the titular Iris). I hope this isn’t a spoiler – we learn pretty early that it was doomed to failure. In Violet’s last minutes, she’s rescued by a team of smugglers operating in the aftermath of a war between Humans and an alien race called the Dwarnians. The crew of the ship, the Rumour, is mostly human, save for the pilot, Krejjh, who is a Dwarnian. The ship’s translator/cook, Brian Jeeter is Krejjh’s partner. Brian studied Dwarnian literature before the war, knowledge that more than once comes in very handy.The crew is also mostly female and there’s a healthy dose of queer.

The first season has the crew running a variety of contraband and trying to keep out of sight of the Earth government. We slowly learn that everyone on the ship has something to hide related to the war. Or reasons to hide (such as: no one was supposed to survive the destruction of the Iris). Eventually we learn how close Krejjh is to the Dwarnian hierarchy (very, but her engagement to a human makes that tenuous).

From very early on we care about this cre and what happens to them and appreciate their qualities and shortfalls and fears.

Also: Did I mention the theme song?: Fear for the Storm always gets to me. It’s refrain, When I go to sea, don’t fear for me, fear for the storm encapsulates the themes of the story: Going up against elemental forces and with the self assurance to say, ‘we’ve beaten unbeatable situations before and we’ll do it again.

Midway through season 3, and we’re totally engaged with all the features of great pulp – the heroes are this close to death in each one and cheating it again and again, as the crew is on an impossible mission to rescue one of their own.

Joe Sam says: Check it out.

The Hebrew word for truth, אמת (emet), is interesting because each letter stands on a solid base – the two feet of the aleph and the tof, and the line of the mem in the middle of the word. In the context of the alef-bet, it forms a tripod, as well, as the alef and the tof are the first and last letters, and the mem sits in the middle. I had a Hebrew teacher when I was about 13 who explained this to me and contrasted it with the word for falsehood, שקר (sheker). Each letter of this word stands on one foot and the letters themselves are grouped at the end of the alef-bet.
With this this mind, I have a large tattoo of the word אמת on my left arm. Six or seven years ago, a Palestinian colleague confronted me saying ‘Your truth is a lie’. I had a few interactions with Nabil and tried to defend my own position with regards to the current Israeli administration. I did a poor job of it. (I’m a lousy marketeer – for all my love of music, I rarely manage to convince people to listen to music I like.) I’ve never managed to defend the position that Israel as a homeland for the Jewish people should have a right to exist. This, please note, is the sole tenet of Zionism – everything else is antisemitic bullshit. I will say that much of what Israel has done for decades is indefensible. (I’m not saying that Hamas’ behavior towards Israel is defensible either. It isn’t. There’s no equivalence)
But back to tattoos. I didn’t have a real connection to the person who did the Hebrew tattoo on me, but I chose the artist who did three or four others on my skin based on his well-documented talent. Freddy Corbin already had a very good reputation 30-plus years ago and earned the nickname Freddy Jesus for his skill with Catholic imagery. What sold me on Corbin’s work was a cover job in his portfolio. A man came to him with a large black SS logo on his arm. He designed and inked a sacred heart over the logo leaving almost none of the nazi image visible.
I’ve found myself thinking in the last few days of how I could have the Hebrew word on my arm covered. From the original philosophical standpoint, the tattoo is defensible. Even from an armchair Zionist perspective, I can still try. And I will not stop defending Israel’s right to exist. But, I continue to ask myself, does this defense – and does this tattoo – signify an implicit defense of the current governing structure?

Again, I’m not comparing my Hebrew text to a nazi logo – there is no comparison. In 1990, or so, the person with that nazi logo determined, or was made to see that the philosophy and hatred behind its symbolism were no longer meaningful to him and he did something to change that. For me, the aspiration towards truth, the aspiration that my words are solid like the tripod of the word, in form and in function, remains, no matter that I fail at it more than I succeed. The aspiration remains.
However, the symbolism of text in Hebrew characters remains a question for me. I’ll point to the band Godspeed You! Black Emperor, some of whose members are Jewish. Their music is mostly instrumental, and they let titles (both album and song) carry a lot of weight. In 2021 they released an album called G_d’s Pee At States’ End, on the CD of which was printed the Yiddish text מיר װעלן זײ איבערלעבן, We will outlive them, meaning antisemites in specific and haters in general. Last year they released a new album for which they were hard pressed to come up with a title. Its name? No Title As of 13 February 2024 28,340 Dead.
The number reflects the purported number of Palestinian dead in Israeli strikes on Gaza between 7 October 2023 and the date in the title – which itself was six months before the album’s release and nearly a year before the cease-fire in that conflict. The only spoken text on the the album is a poem read in Spanish on the song Raindrops Cast In Lead. (Gracious, can you imagine the guts behind that song title?)
As with the band, I too can contain multitudes – insisting on my continued existence as a Jew and being ambivalent about the nature of my truth, and outraged at what is done in its name.